Stephen Russell wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:28 PM, MB Software Solutions General > Account <[email protected]> wrote: >> Stephen Russell wrote: >>> Only problem is that the web work you do is not leveraging your >>> existing vfp environment. So I can see the complaints that people >>> here have with requests for web facing apps. >> >> http://guineu.foxpert.com/ > ------------------------------------- > > Not sure how useful this would be in an every day usage say in a website. > > Most VFP code is closely tied to data. You cannot pass a control with > it's contents to a standard method you wrote to do a standard > operation. > > You cannot pass a cursor and have anything in .NET know what to do with it. > > Maybe you could create a WS and point it's functionality to a VFP code > block to do the work for you and replay back with string or XML? > > I don't see this as a save all, just a bandaid on reuse of older > method code that is non data bound. > > YMMV. >
But then again, websites are not meant to necessarily replace data-entry apps!!!!!! You can't paint them with the same brush, which is what I read from your reply. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
