Oops, i sent you the 2-500gb model.  This is the one we have and you want.

http://www.buy.com/prod/netgear-readynas-nv-1tb-gigabit-desktop-network-storage-4x250gb/q/loc/101/204696977.html

 


--- On Fri, 2/27/09, Michael Madigan <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Michael Madigan <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [NF] Building an easily expandable huge data share for home
> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, February 27, 2009, 3:02 PM
> We're using this at a client's site
> 
> http://www.buy.com/prod/netgear-readynas-nv-1tb-gigabit-desktop-network-storage-2x500gb/q/loc/101/204696978.html
> 
> 
> 4 drives, RAID-5, uses little power, has built-in backup
> features, etc.  It will send you an email when it encounters
> an error.
> 
> The only drawback we've seen is the throughput is a
> little slow for live data.  If you're using it for
> backup, or data storage and not for live database
> operations, it works very well.
> 
> I would recommend it and it hardly takes up any space at
> all.
> 
> It's now down to $650.00, we paid about $900 only about
> 6 months ago.
> 
>  
> 
> --- On Fri, 2/27/09, Steve Ellenoff
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > From: Steve Ellenoff <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [NF] Building an easily expandable huge data
> share for home
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Friday, February 27, 2009, 12:44 PM
> > My other post about interest in Windows Home Server
> was
> > mainly due to 
> > my strong desire to build an easily expandable huge
> data
> > store for my 
> > home, though I would think any corporate environment
> small
> > or large 
> > would have similar needs.
> > 
> > Here are my goals:
> > 1) One single huge store of data in the 10-20TB range
> ( I
> > can never 
> > find all the files I want, as they are scatted on many
> > 500GB drives )
> > 2) Put to good use, all the various different sized
> drives
> > I have 
> > lying around ( I hate wasting a perfectly good drive )
> > 3) Ability to simply add new drives to instantly
> expand
> > capacity ( 
> > This rules out most RAID setups )
> > 4) Ability to hotswap drives when a drive fails.
> > 5) Safety in case of a drive failure in the storage
> pool
> > (ie some 
> > form of redundancy)
> > 6) Ability to remove drives from the pool in order to
> > recover files 
> > in the event the server crashes (ie you cannot read
> RAID
> > drives 
> > outside of the RAID setup)
> > 7) Inexpensive ( ie, perfer to build from existing
> parts
> > rather than 
> > fork over for new hardware )
> > 8) Ability to have automated backup computers in my
> home
> > (many of 
> > which have themselves huge drives 500GB)
> > 9) Keep everything as Green as possible, so the server
> > could be a 
> > fairly low powered energy efficient machine
> > 10) Super simple, minimal fuss, idiot proof
> functionality,
> > both setup 
> > and maintenance.
> > 11) Reliable and stable ( putting all your data on 1
> server
> > is a 
> > scary thing, it must be super stable and have easy
> external
> > backup of 
> > it's contents )
> > 
> > I was attracted to the marketing of Windows Home
> Server as
> > it claims 
> > to address most if not all of my goals above. My
> biggest
> > concern with 
> > it is #11, reliability. Realize that I would be
> building my
> > own WMS 
> > from retired computers, rather than forking over 500$
> for
> > an HP 
> > MediaSmart machine, so the outlay of $ is a simple $99
> fee
> > for the OS.
> > 
> > I am not sure if there are any alternatives that meet
> all
> > the above 
> > goals, but I'm hoping you guys have some
> suggestions
> > and thoughts?
> > 
> > In researching a bit more, I found that Drobo came
> close to
> > meeting 
> > my desires of an easily expandable storage pool
> (although
> > you're 
> > limited to 4 drives only), however I've read
> several
> > really bad 
> > reviews of it online about data loss and slow
> performance,
> > plus the 
> > cost of the unit (500$ w/o any drives) all of which
> makes
> > me less 
> > than thrilled about the idea.
> > 
> > FreeNAS seems to be recommended often as well, but
> I've
> > not seen any 
> > mention of FreeNAS having the ability to expand
> capacity
> > and have 
> > data redundancy easily. On top of that,
> > I've never loved linux command lines.
> > 
> > I've not written off any of these 3 solutions, so
> if
> > someone with 
> > experience wants to chime in about which way I should
> go,
> > please do, 
> > or better, if there's a method I'm
> overlooking,
> > please do tell.
> > 
> > Thanks everyone-
> > Steve
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Post Messages to: [email protected]
> > Subscription Maintenance:
> > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> > OT-free version of this list:
> > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> > Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> > This message:
> >
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
> > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are
> > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute
> legal or
> > medical advice. This statement is added to the
> messages for
> > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: [email protected]
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to