>> But mostly I don't get how you can make the proprietary/closed argument
with such smugness.<<

I'm sorry Paul, not sure what came over me. I thought I stated observations
that is common knowledge in the industry. I'm not trying to be smug.

But how should I observe differently? How many companies run the iPhone OS
on their hardware? Not that WinMobile is the holy grail by any stretch of
the imagination, but I can get a phone from lots of manufactures that run
the OS, from lots of phone companies. And all the apps people can come up
with (without any stinking approval process). iPhone is locked into one
vendor, one manufacturer and a committee telling me what I can run.

Apple is the smug one. Not me.

Commodity hardware inside a computer does not make it open. Who can I call
to get a computer that runs the Mac OS? 

Are you defending that they are not closed? It is hard to argue as they have
been this way since day 1.

Amazon made the same mistake with the Kindle unfortunately. They think they
got the world by the short hairs. Yes, they have cool products. They turn
that power into a position where they decide what can be purchased, and how
you purchase, and then decide they can pull what you bought off the machine
you purchased. At least Amazon apologized when they saw the error of their
decision. Hopefully Apple will do the same with this app.

Rick
White Light Computing, Inc.

www.whitelightcomputing.com
www.swfox.net
www.rickschummer.com





_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/001201ca116e$f9525e00$ebf71a...@com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to