Bob Calco wrote:
>> And here I was, thinking Christians didn't like Freud. :-)
>>     
>
> I don't, but for those of you still under the law of sin, obviously, his
> obsession with sexual imagery is relevant. 
>   
Nah... that's for you repressed blokes. I get the real thing, not the 
imagery. :-)

> Again, you remember just enough of these Biblical allusions to blow your own
> foot off.
>
> You are under no condemnation from me for being an offensive jerk, so there
> are no stones to worry about from my vector.
>   
My, what a language!

> Oh rest assured, we both are! That's why we don't live together any
>> more
>> but are still in somewhat friendly terms. :-)
>>     
>
> Well, that's progress. Before the excuse was "She made me this way, so I did
> the noble thing and left".
>   
Nope, that was YOUR interpretation of my words. Shit! You christians 
have always issues with interpretation of other people's words, don't 
you? It has even provoked a couple of schisms.
> Ah, THAT would make you feel special. At least we're getting to the bottom
> of your self-loathing problem.
>   
YES, YES, I confess!!! I loathe myself! boooohoooooo.......... 8-)

>> God! Is my english so bad? I meant I abhorred MY abuse of strength, and
>> that's why I did not like who I was at her side. You know, eliminate
>> the
>> cause of temptation and you eliminate the sin, your church has used
>> that
>> a lot. :-)
>>     
>
> Well, but the deeper issue is whence the violent temper? You'll be chopping
> off all kinds of limbs for offending you, even a few of your own, till you
> deal square with that.
>   
Nah! I like it that way.

>> Well mate, if you can't tell the difference between a TV and a
>> person....
>> And the "battered wives" stuff is just another lowly blow, never hit
>> ANY
>> woman and remember I left because of the episode, so you won't be able
>> to tag me with that. :-)
>>     
>
> One day, that little temper of yours is going to hurt something besides an
> appliance, while you continue to seek refuge in the pleasures of the flesh.
>   
Wrong again! You are too literary. I seek pleasure in the "pleasures of 
the flesh". No need to seek for anything else.... oh yeah, I also GIVE 
pleasure, but that's way over your head, so let's not go there.
> Pete's a good guy, even if he is a latter day socialist. I don't think
> you're much less misogynous than you claim he is, you're just more
> hormonally in tune with your animal instincts and far more likely to let
> them override your cerebral cortex.
>   
I'm not in tune with my animal instincts, and they don't override my 
cerebral cortex. I AM an animal so the instincts are part of ME, and 
therefore they don't need to override anything. Oh, and Pete's an ass. 
Ask any woman and she'll tell you.

> I can't imagine Pete swatting a fly (which is probably why he was so
> impressed when Obama did it), much less nearly hitting a woman and busting a
> 32" TV with his bare hands.
>   
There you go again. And now raising false testimony. I did not "nearly" 
hit a woman, I meant to hit the TV and I did. And wow! The "bare hands" 
part was a nice touch!
> No, more like treat others as you'd have them treat you. Since you already
> treat me this way, and I reciprocate, it would almost be impossible for
> either of us to violate the Golden Rule, unless one of us was a 32" TV.
>   
You mean you would have me treat you this way? You are into masochism 
now? LOL

> See, I finally display a little genuine Christian charity, and this is how
> he treats me. LOL! 
>   
Told you Bobby, you're the christian here. I cant be, I just dislike 
hypocrisy too much.
But it's an interesting concept of christian behaviour that you think 
you are free to exercise your hatred on people who don't feel subjected 
to your rules.... and as always  :-)

Cheers



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to