Perhaps if you were a Christian you could hold together a relationship and put your fist through a TV.
--- On Thu, 8/13/09, Ricardo Aráoz <ricar...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Ricardo Aráoz <ricar...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [OT] This is what obama care will give us > To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com> > Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009, 11:07 PM > Bob Calco wrote: > >> And here I was, thinking Christians didn't like > Freud. :-) > >> > > > > I don't, but for those of you still under the law of > sin, obviously, his > > obsession with sexual imagery is relevant. > > > Nah... that's for you repressed blokes. I get the real > thing, not the > imagery. :-) > > > Again, you remember just enough of these Biblical > allusions to blow your own > > foot off. > > > > You are under no condemnation from me for being an > offensive jerk, so there > > are no stones to worry about from my vector. > > > My, what a language! > > > Oh rest assured, we both are! That's why we don't live > together any > >> more > >> but are still in somewhat friendly terms. :-) > >> > > > > Well, that's progress. Before the excuse was "She made > me this way, so I did > > the noble thing and left". > > > Nope, that was YOUR interpretation of my words. Shit! You > christians > have always issues with interpretation of other people's > words, don't > you? It has even provoked a couple of schisms. > > Ah, THAT would make you feel special. At least we're > getting to the bottom > > of your self-loathing problem. > > > YES, YES, I confess!!! I loathe myself! > boooohoooooo.......... 8-) > > >> God! Is my english so bad? I meant I abhorred MY > abuse of strength, and > >> that's why I did not like who I was at her side. > You know, eliminate > >> the > >> cause of temptation and you eliminate the sin, > your church has used > >> that > >> a lot. :-) > >> > > > > Well, but the deeper issue is whence the violent > temper? You'll be chopping > > off all kinds of limbs for offending you, even a few > of your own, till you > > deal square with that. > > > Nah! I like it that way. > > >> Well mate, if you can't tell the difference > between a TV and a > >> person.... > >> And the "battered wives" stuff is just another > lowly blow, never hit > >> ANY > >> woman and remember I left because of the episode, > so you won't be able > >> to tag me with that. :-) > >> > > > > One day, that little temper of yours is going to hurt > something besides an > > appliance, while you continue to seek refuge in the > pleasures of the flesh. > > > Wrong again! You are too literary. I seek pleasure in the > "pleasures of > the flesh". No need to seek for anything else.... oh yeah, > I also GIVE > pleasure, but that's way over your head, so let's not go > there. > > Pete's a good guy, even if he is a latter day > socialist. I don't think > > you're much less misogynous than you claim he is, > you're just more > > hormonally in tune with your animal instincts and far > more likely to let > > them override your cerebral cortex. > > > I'm not in tune with my animal instincts, and they don't > override my > cerebral cortex. I AM an animal so the instincts are part > of ME, and > therefore they don't need to override anything. Oh, and > Pete's an ass. > Ask any woman and she'll tell you. > > > I can't imagine Pete swatting a fly (which is probably > why he was so > > impressed when Obama did it), much less nearly hitting > a woman and busting a > > 32" TV with his bare hands. > > > There you go again. And now raising false testimony. I did > not "nearly" > hit a woman, I meant to hit the TV and I did. And wow! The > "bare hands" > part was a nice touch! > > No, more like treat others as you'd have them treat > you. Since you already > > treat me this way, and I reciprocate, it would almost > be impossible for > > either of us to violate the Golden Rule, unless one of > us was a 32" TV. > > > You mean you would have me treat you this way? You are into > masochism > now? LOL > > > See, I finally display a little genuine Christian > charity, and this is how > > he treats me. LOL! > > > Told you Bobby, you're the christian here. I cant be, I > just dislike > hypocrisy too much. > But it's an interesting concept of christian behaviour that > you think > you are free to exercise your hatred on people who don't > feel subjected > to your rules.... and as always :-) > > Cheers > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a84d4f6.9000...@gmail.com > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/133290.71875...@web31402.mail.mud.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
