Pete,
There you go again.
Do you <know> what an Advanced Directive is? It has nothing to do with 
Euthenasia and has ONLY to do with an opportunity to put down in words 
what you want done for yourself if you get to a point where you are 
incapacitated. Geez. You should know better than that with your 
experience in the medical field.
It is where you can decide, YOU, and NO ONE ELSE, that if the worse 
comes to worse, just how far you want them to go to keep you alive... 
once you are at a point where you are not able to make those decisions 
for yourself.
This has nothing to do with socialism, <illegals>, Obama, health reform 
or anything except WHAT ARE YOUR PERSONAL WISHES for treatment.
Once you are incapacitated, it is difficult to speak with the 
practitioner and discuss what to do...
The health providers I know, wish everyone would have these on file to 
make decision making easier so NO ONE ELSE has to decide for you. This 
is for ALL AGES, not just elderly.
We all should have one on file to assist our relatives, friends and care 
practitioners when the worse comes to worse.
Give me a break.
-Philip

Pete Theisen wrote:
> Philip Borkholder wrote:
>   
>> Michael (and all the other Chicken Littles out there)
>> Advanced Directives are commonly discussed
>>     
>
> Hi Philip,
>
> Oh! Well, why didn't someone say so! If it isn't called "euthanasia" but 
> rather a buzzword or catchphrase such as "Advanced Directives" then it 
> is just - killing the old or sick people. Silly us to dare object!
>
> Abortion and euthanasia are the same issue. The "mutt" is a huge fan of 
> abortion so he is a huge fan of euthanasia! Of course his bill has 
> euthanasia! It is of keen interest to me because I am of the age and 
> condition where "progressives" would consider me a "useless eater".
>
> A couple of years ago I was flat refused health care for a couple of 
> years because I couldn't "qualify". At the same time illegals were being 
> routinely seen at the same clinic with no qualifications whatsoever - 
> unless speaking *no* English is a qualification, but they were younger 
> and could be put back to work with a shot and a bottle of pills.
>
> When confronted with the fact that the illegals had no qualification I 
> demanded the same privilege, got nothing. I am diabetic and they knew 
> it, didn't make any difference, actually they preferred that I have 
> something like that, since they were trying to kill me. They still are, 
> but are not quite as daring about it now that I have written to every 
> politician I can think of and the newspaper.
>
> There were something like five pages of euthanasia in the link Bob 
> posted. You are right that it is nothing new, though. Just that to those 
> affected it is getting old.
>   


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a85b644.40...@netzero.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to