Stephen Russell wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:26 PM, MB Software Solutions, > LLC<[email protected]> wrote: >> Gilbert M. Hale wrote: >>>> Does this mean you cannot do a 'crud' app in .net ? >>>> >>> I suppose a crud app in VFP would work great, run fast, do the job intended >>> or needed, etc. A crud app in .net may not run at all <g>... >> >> Oh it will run...you just spend many more hours designing it to do what >> you could do oh so easily in VFP. > ---------------------------- > > You spend the time in .NET where you could just crank it over the > weekend in VFP to protect your namesake. When someone comes behind > you to do the next part of the app you don't want them saying: > > 1) WTF doesn't test apps > 2) What idiot did data calls from the GUI > 3) Why are there 100 classes in the same .cs file. > > I could go on but I have to read up for tomorrows meetings. :) >
There's no automated test-harness (afaik) for VFP, but the other 2 don't apply except to a poor craftsman, imo. -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
