On Aug 27, 2009, at 4:24 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: > I'm not for socialism, but I am for this.
Can't have it both ways. So say the congress says the law applies to public companies over 100 employees. that would be typical for such a law. How many fit that? US Census says about 46,000 (as of 1997). How many gov't employees does it take just to monitor them? Oh, yeah, they need to be accountants to figure out "real" compensation. And they need clerks, secretaries, office space, furniture, software (opportunity for us?) and all of the support structure necessary to get it done. And after monitoring, you need enforcement. How many folks will that take from Treasury, FBI or whichever agency is designated for enforcement? Guess what, judging from, well *anything* the federal government does, they would be way *less* successful at enforcing something like this than the current system, which would take shareholders rebelling. That is a *very* low bar. It is one of those ideas that plays well sung by pandering politicians. Ken _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/f07f2cb6-7d56-4c90-815e-e79dc1a23...@information-architecture.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
