On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:06 AM, MB Software Solutions,
LLC<[email protected]> wrote:
> Michael Madigan wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>> Almost all companies take Government money in some form.  Should companies 
>> that sell to the Government also limit their CEO pay?
>
>
> How about a rule that says the CEO cannot make more than 400x the lowest
> paid worker.  That might sound harsh, but c'mon...400x.  That's FOUR
> HUNDRED TIMES.  So in ONE DAY'S WAGE, the f*cking CEO makes more than
> Janitor Jim makes ALL F*CKING YEAR.  Say Janitor Jim makes $25,000 per
> year.  That means the CEO cannot make more than $10,000,000.  Now you
> and I both know that there are CEOs out there who are basically RAPING
> the system with their salaries that are much much higher than that.  And
> I cannot for the life of me understand why/how they can negotiate
> compensation "golden parachute" packages that allow them to profit
> HIGHLY when they f*ck up and get fired.  That's just plain insanity in
> the "good ol' boys club" of corporate America.  Total bs, imo.
-----------------------------------


In your example why is the Board of Directors giving their hard earned
profits away to this CEO?  They are the ones who decide his/her
revenue structure.

Why are you going to make LAWS to fix a problem that is only in your
vision not theirs?

Do I think that their income is immense?  Yes.  Do I allow my jealousy
get the better part of me?  I try not to.

-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
SQL Server DBA
Web and Winform Development
Independent Contractor
Memphis TN

901.246-0159


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to