On 11/10/2009 11:44 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Nov 10, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> Your statement lacks context, and seem to generalize that >> the absence of handguns insures a peaceful, quite, >> nonviolent society, and the presence of handguns guarantees >> violence and death. > > > Not at all! I'm simply reacting to your statement that being armed == > safe. >
O/K, my statement was a little too general, also. What I was trying to say is I would be safer and better able to protect myself and property, if I were armed, should someone or something threaten harm. The possibilities in which harm might present itself are endless, so good judgment is essential, and must be applied based on each circumstance. Regards, LelandJ > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
