Sometimes it is and sometimes it isn't. So what is your point.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Leafe" <[email protected]> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:44 PM Subject: Re: [OT] > On Nov 10, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> Your statement lacks context, and seem to generalize that >> the absence of handguns insures a peaceful, quite, >> nonviolent society, and the presence of handguns guarantees >> violence and death. > > > Not at all! I'm simply reacting to your statement that being armed == > safe. > > > -- Ed Leafe > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/af388e8ee1124fc893488a07836c9...@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
