Stephen Russell wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Pete Theisen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Michael Madigan wrote: > >> Actually, there is a limit, they just don't tell you that there is. They >> think they are Microsoft. >> -- > ------------------------- > > Did you read what the AT&T POV was based on Pete? > > AT&T says that they provide 3G service to a huge area. They do NOT > own all of the equipment and if my call is serviced by another > carrier, better known as roaming, then AT&T eats that side bill from > CarrierB. They hope that enough of CarrierB's customers cross over to > AT&T equipment and it's a wash. > > Well this couple live in an area by CarrierB and ATT&T has no towers > to service them. > > AT&T has found that the actual usage of this couple is high, probably > because it shows up on the invoice from CarrierB. > > Instead of getting canned at least this couple was getting word from > AT&T about the volume of usage and the two are trying to work together > instead of just disconnecting him.
Hi Stephen, The problem is not that there is a limit, but that they advertise "no limit" when in fact there is a limit. Prison now, hell later. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
