Stephen Russell wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Pete Theisen <[email protected]> wrote: >> The problem is not that there is a limit, but that they advertise "no >> limit" when in fact there is a limit. Prison now, hell later.
> There is always a limit to everything Pete. That is why you have the > multi page contract to sign. Because few people ever read them the > originator of the contract probably set in the Free Roaming the clause > that contains the limits. Hi Stephen, All advertising is a lie, the contracts are an admission of the lies and a declaration that the service is not as advertised. I know, let's limit contracts to one page and outlaw all disclaimers. Truth, give us truth. If that makes the rich guys poor, too bad. > I wonder if the couple hacked the phone to have it be their modem for > the computer at home as well. Which is part of the contract but was > easily doable early on. :) No way to know from our position. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
