> I am in favour of paying, say Brazil, for not deforesting it's rain
> forest. It is one of the few remaining lungs of the planet. Even a
> simpleton can understand that we need breathable air and that it's
> vegetables that allow that to happen. On the other side Brazil has every
> right to exploit it's natural resources (just as your country did and
> does), so it's only natural to pay them for the air  (and weather
> patterns) they produce.
>

Vaska dear:

Great, then pay us not to drive our SUVs. Don't force us to stop
driving them AND have to pay you some arbitrarily obnoxious sum
because we did.

That's what's different about the farce going on at Hopenchangen. They
are using falsified data to make a claim to certainty THEY cannot
honestly make, in order to fleece us and steal our sovereignty, on the
pretense that doing so somehow would save the planet.

It's all hogwash and should be soundly rejected.

- Publius

"It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country,
under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object
of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to
subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign
powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of
them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be
avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose
situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful
and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to