On 12/01/2009 09:45 AM, Pete Theisen wrote: > Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >>>>>> Denial of the problem is not an option. > >>>>> The left has a humongous problem with denial. Catch a lefty in a lie and >>>>> all the other lefties ignore it. Every time. >>>>> >>>>> It never occurs to them that their whole belief structure is based upon >>>>> a stack of falsehoods, and none of their crap can be trusted. Sure, they >>>>> tell the truth once a year, but how does anyone know, least of all >>>>> themselves, when that is? >>>>> >>>>> Talk about *faith*! >>>> A lie and denial are not the same thing, but you already >>>> know that. LOL >>> >>> Hi Leland, >>> >>> Do I? How are they different? Be specific. > > Hi Leland, > > Well, in the case of the left, almost everything they say is a lie. You > confront them with that and you get denial. Thus, the difference is > academic at best, and serves only to deflect from the real issue. > > I confront you with the fact that the left has recently been caught in a > huge whopper and you go off on denial. That is denial, and it is a lie > as well.
Your statement regarding scientists propagating a "huge whopper" is a little thin, if it's based on the article provided by Maximus who started the thread "Oops! Climate Change Data Dumped". The data was dumped during a move of the UEA’s Climatic Research Unit, so storage for newer data could be created. I'm sure data retention of global warming data has very limited retention values, as science advances in ways that provide much better data and models of the problem, so I'm having difficulty understanding how dumping old data that supported an old, less sophisticated models of global warming is a lie, eg (huge whooper). There are many agencies/departments/governments around the world that study global warming, and they all use somewhat different models and approaches in their studies of the problem, but they all seem to agree that a global warming/climate change problem exists. This leads me to believe that you are in denial about the problem, and searching of any thread, (LOL) of evidence that might be used to discredit global warming warnings. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936328.ece Regards, LelandJ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
