So how did the Ice Age end? Too many SUVs? --- On Fri, 1/8/10, Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OT] More global warming for Michael > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, January 8, 2010, 5:40 PM > Nice try but sorry. I don't buy that > argument. Data since 1880 is sufficient > for me to accept that the planet is warming up. I have to > live within my > lifetime and make decisions on that timeframe. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Madigan" <[email protected]> > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 1:24 PM > Subject: Re: [OT] More global warming for Michael > > > Nick, > > 130 years is 130/4,000,000,000 of the life of the > planet. What could you > possibly tell in that short of time. That's like > measuring your life by the > last 1.2 minutes and determining what your future holds. > > During that time not only has CO2 increased, but radio > waves, the number of > women wearing pants, and the number of golden retrievers. > > Then there is the issue of contamination of the > data. As urban creep sets > in, suddenly instead of being out in a pasture somewhere, > the thermometers > are surrounded by the heat islands of major cities. > > > > --- On Fri, 1/8/10, Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > From: Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [OT] More global warming for Michael > > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > > Date: Friday, January 8, 2010, 12:53 PM > > Look at the chart at the bottom of > > the article I quoted. It shows global > > temperatures and CO2 concentration since 1880. I could > care > > less about the > > change since 2005. It is totally irrelevant. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michael Madigan" <[email protected]> > > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 11:16 AM > > Subject: Re: [OT] More global warming for Michael > > > > > > > > Additionally, average world temperature is declining > even > > though co2 levels > > are skyrocketing. > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Satellite_Temperatures.png > > > > Notice the temperature declines since 2005. The trend > > line was broken, yet, > > the graph still shows an upper trend line. What junk > > science! > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 1/8/10, Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > From: Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > > > Subject: [OT] More global warming for Michael > > > To: [email protected] > > > Date: Friday, January 8, 2010, 10:50 AM > > > Here is a blurb from > > > http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/weather-climate-cold-snap-global-warming/story?id=9505043 > > > > > > << ------- > > > No, the cold snap in some parts of the northern > > hemisphere > > > (New York, Florida, Beijing, Northern India, > Europe) > > does > > > not mean that manmade global warming is not > happening, > > or > > > even that it's happening just a little less. > > > This is, of course, an old story...and more and > more > > 5th > > > graders are bringing it home from their science > > classes to > > > get their parents up to date on the latest > climate > > science. > > > > > > > > > Bottom line -- fast and simple? Three points: > > > > > > 1. Weather is not climate. > > > > > > 2. Manmade global warming means less frequent > > cold snaps > > > (not none at all) and more frequent heat waves -- > just > > as > > > we've been having. > > > > > > 3. You know (don't you?) about the record high > > > temperatures this week in Washington State, > Alaska > > and > > > Bulgaria in the Northern Hemisphere -- plus, > down > > south, the > > > record-breaking high temperatures in New Zealand, > and > > the > > > second hottest year on record (after 2005) in > > Australia? > > > > > > --->> > > > > > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > > > multipart/related > > > multipart/alternative > > > text/plain (text body -- kept) > > > text/html > > > image/gif > > > --- > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/26f7a5aeae284884a67df8ebdd0ba...@dual > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
