You mean like now, completely natural? --- On Sun, 1/10/10, Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OT] More global warming for Michael > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, January 10, 2010, 9:53 PM > The planet got warmer. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Madigan" <[email protected]> > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 2:09 PM > Subject: Re: [OT] More global warming for Michael > > > So how did the Ice Age end? Too many SUVs? > > --- On Fri, 1/8/10, Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > From: Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [OT] More global warming for Michael > > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > > Date: Friday, January 8, 2010, 5:40 PM > > Nice try but sorry. I don't buy that > > argument. Data since 1880 is sufficient > > for me to accept that the planet is warming up. I have > to > > live within my > > lifetime and make decisions on that timeframe. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michael Madigan" <[email protected]> > > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 1:24 PM > > Subject: Re: [OT] More global warming for Michael > > > > > > Nick, > > > > 130 years is 130/4,000,000,000 of the life of the > > planet. What could you > > possibly tell in that short of time. That's like > > measuring your life by the > > last 1.2 minutes and determining what your future > holds. > > > > During that time not only has CO2 increased, but > radio > > waves, the number of > > women wearing pants, and the number of golden > retrievers. > > > > Then there is the issue of contamination of the > > data. As urban creep sets > > in, suddenly instead of being out in a pasture > somewhere, > > the thermometers > > are surrounded by the heat islands of major cities. > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 1/8/10, Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > From: Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [OT] More global warming for > Michael > > > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > > > Date: Friday, January 8, 2010, 12:53 PM > > > Look at the chart at the bottom of > > > the article I quoted. It shows global > > > temperatures and CO2 concentration since 1880. I > could > > care > > > less about the > > > change since 2005. It is totally irrelevant. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Michael Madigan" <[email protected]> > > > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 11:16 AM > > > Subject: Re: [OT] More global warming for > Michael > > > > > > > > > > > > Additionally, average world temperature is > declining > > even > > > though co2 levels > > > are skyrocketing. > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Satellite_Temperatures.png > > > > > > Notice the temperature declines since 2005. The > trend > > > line was broken, yet, > > > the graph still shows an upper trend line. What > junk > > > science! > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 1/8/10, Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > From: Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > > > > Subject: [OT] More global warming for > Michael > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Date: Friday, January 8, 2010, 10:50 AM > > > > Here is a blurb from > > > > http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/weather-climate-cold-snap-global-warming/story?id=9505043 > > > > > > > > << ------- > > > > No, the cold snap in some parts of the > northern > > > hemisphere > > > > (New York, Florida, Beijing, Northern > India, > > Europe) > > > does > > > > not mean that manmade global warming is not > > happening, > > > or > > > > even that it's happening just a little > less. > > > > This is, of course, an old story...and more > and > > more > > > 5th > > > > graders are bringing it home from their > science > > > classes to > > > > get their parents up to date on the latest > > climate > > > science. > > > > > > > > > > > > Bottom line -- fast and simple? Three > points: > > > > > > > > 1. Weather is not climate. > > > > > > > > 2. Manmade global warming means less > frequent > > > cold snaps > > > > (not none at all) and more frequent heat > waves -- > > just > > > as > > > > we've been having. > > > > > > > > 3. You know (don't you?) about the record > high > > > > temperatures this week in Washington State, > > Alaska > > > and > > > > Bulgaria in the Northern Hemisphere -- > plus, > > down > > > south, the > > > > record-breaking high temperatures in New > Zealand, > > and > > > the > > > > second hottest year on record (after 2005) > in > > > Australia? > > > > > > > > --->> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts > --- > > > > multipart/related > > > > multipart/alternative > > > > text/plain (text body -- kept) > > > > text/html > > > > image/gif > > >[excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
