Publius Maximus wrote: > I wouldn't get too excited about that idea, Mike. He can still do a > lot of damage via the courts, executive orders, and purging the > federal bureaucracies and loading it with unionized lunatics that no > future Republican president can even fire (and who will actively work > against him/her, like certain agents in the CIA and State Department > did against Bush), over the next 3 years. > > All it means is we can prevent a few of the wilder things he's doing > in the open. Only if Republicans take both houses of Congress in > November can we effectively neuter his efforts to "fundamentally > transform America" into his Alinsky-style thugocracy, and even by then > a lot of damage has been done by the front loading of all this > pointless debt. > > Just denying him a supermajority only makes it somewhat harder for > him. Actually it was good he had it for a little bit, so the people > can see just what a lying sack of shit he is about transparency and > openness and non-partisanship. But now he has to be stopped cold, and > we are still a ways from being able to do that.
Hi Bob, How can that be done? The only thing I can think of it the Birth Certificate Issue. And no one can get that moving it seems, unless the press changes sides. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
