As usual you leave out the portion about what is best for the community, or the state, or even the country
Just because you believe something is gray or a lesser wrong, doesn't mean that the rest of the community will agree with you and it is the community, state or even countries welfare that needs to be the primary objective, not some concept such as my wrong is less wrong then your wrong -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 10:25 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] The Fallacy of Gray On Feb 24, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > Two wrongs are purely and simply wrong and do not make a right, or even a > shade of gray of a right, unless of course you are trying to justify to > yourself that it is ok to do whatever you were doing that you knew was > wrong. Oh, geez. Do you not understand that "right" and "wrong" are not limited to your moral beliefs? That they also have another meaning of "correct" and "incorrect"? That because two answers are both wrong, that one can be closer to the correct answer than the other? Wow, I guess I overestimated the willingness of people on this list to think instead of reflexively spew. -- Ed Leafe [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/6daba596eb2f49648cfd7daaf4d03...@stanpc ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
