I got that part. But the point is that you are assuming one knows which one is correct or not. If something is not known, then every comment afterwards is bogus. It is all an argument in thin air.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Leafe" <[email protected]> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 11:24 AM Subject: Re: [OT] The Fallacy of Gray > On Feb 24, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > >> Two wrongs are purely and simply wrong and do not make a right, or even a >> shade of gray of a right, unless of course you are trying to justify to >> yourself that it is ok to do whatever you were doing that you knew was >> wrong. > > Oh, geez. Do you not understand that "right" and "wrong" are not limited > to your moral beliefs? That they also have another meaning of "correct" > and "incorrect"? That because two answers are both wrong, that one can be > closer to the correct answer than the other? > > Wow, I guess I overestimated the willingness of people on this list to > think instead of reflexively spew. > > > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/b89c2c3eeac34f1995020f49c7ec7...@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
