Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > As usual you leave out the portion about what is best for the community, or > the state, or even the country > > Just because you believe something is gray or a lesser wrong, doesn't mean > that the rest of the community will agree with you and it is the community, > state or even countries welfare that needs to be the primary objective, not > some concept such as my wrong is less wrong then your wrong >
So you state that if something is "more wrong" (in a non-moral way) than some other thing, nevertheless it will be "better" (in a non-moral way) for the community? What an odd thinking process! I'd *love* to study your brain. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
