let me ask a theoretical question. Lets assume that the reason that they were going bankrupt was that they, and the majority of the large corporations had sent about 30 million jobs offshore. Do you suppose the missing sales of 30 million time an average of 55,000 per year would have bankrupted them?
Do you wonder why we do not mandate that these corporations report on their quarterly and annual reports how many employees they have onshore and offshore? Yep, I'm well aware that many will say that I'm full of bs and that I can't prove it, but on the other hand I will say that you can't prove it either because we do not track these numbers. Why is that? On 3/20/2010 5:01 PM, geoff wrote: > || Well here we are, and having nationalized most of the auto and banking > industry, Obama's going for a whole sixth of the US economy next.|| > > Of course the fact that they were all bankrupt and heading under doesn't > form part of your argument. There were two choices NO car or banking > industry or heavily nationalised industries. Its not like he nationalised > Microsoft or one of you actual profitable industries! CONTEXT BOB.... try > it... > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Publius Maximus > Sent: Sunday, 21 March 2010 1:12 AM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Impeach the President > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The information you provide is cherry picked and spun, (eg twisted), to >> spread fear; an extremely contagious disease. Fear is the weapon of >> choice of the Republican party, that uses it for political gain and power. >> >> Hitler and Stalin also used fear very effectively, but in the end truth >> trumps fear, and actions speak louder than words, especially words used >> to foster fear, uncertainty and doubt, where none really exists. LOL >> The actions of President Obama, and his administration, clearly indicate >> they are working very hard to protect the best interest of the country >> and the American people, much to the chagrin of Republicans. >> > Stop being a mindless weasel and answer my questions. > > I can back up every single one of them with evidence and factual > information you cannot refute. So, I'd like to hear your spin in each > particular. > > There simply is no getting around the mass of evidence that he is a > communist, bent on breaking our system. > > I remember once upon a time your denying any possibility that Obama or > anybody else was going to nationalize anything. This was back when > Maxine Waters was the subject. > > Well here we are, and having nationalized most of the auto and banking > industry, Obama's going for a whole sixth of the US economy next. > > At what point do you concede I was right about that, and you were wrong? > > - Publius > > >> Regards, >> >> LelandJ >> >> >> On 03/19/2010 06:22 PM, Publius Maximus wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> The history of Soviet Russia, including the Bolshevik revolution, >>>> Marxist Socialism and the Communist party, has nothing to do with >>>> President Obama and his administration who believe strongly in Democracy >>>> under the USA Constitution and Bill of Rights. >>>> >>>> >>> LOL, then please kindly explain why: >>> >>> * Obama's "green jobs" czar Van Jones founded STORM, an openly >>> communist revolutionary movement, in the mid-nineties, and yet Valerie >>> Jarrett, Obama's closest adviser, lauds Jones open as precisely the >>> kind of person they're looking for in the new administration. >>> >>> * Obama's Communication Director, Anita Dunn, lists Mao Tse Tung as >>> one of her top two political philosophers during a high school >>> graduation ceremony last year. >>> >>> * Obama's "Diversity Czar" Mark Lloyd openly praised Hugo Chavez and >>> his "revolution" in Venezuela (an openly "socialist" and indeed >>> "communist" revolution). >>> >>> * Obama's "guru" is the Marxist professor Saul Alinsky (under whom >>> Hillary! also trained incidentally), coiner of the term "community >>> organizer" and author of "Rules for Radicals," a leftist handbook akin >>> to Machiavelli's The Prince for destroying America's middle class and >>> ushering in a groovy new era of socialism. >>> >>> * Obama was a member of the socialist party in Chicago before he >>> entered politics "officially" as a "liberal Democrat". >>> >>> * Obama in a 2003 radio interview described the US Constitution as >>> "fundamentally flawed to this day," and bemoaned the fact that it was >>> in his words a "negative" contract, describing only what the >>> government cannot do TO you, instead of (as he preferred) what it >>> "MUST" do "ON YOUR BEHALF". >>> >>> I have a *very* long list of such observations. Please, start with these. >>> >>> - Publius >>> >>> >>> > "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country, > under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object > of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to > subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign > powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of > them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be > avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose > situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful > and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59] > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
