On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:16 PM, geoff <[email protected]> wrote: > || I love how you think you're some kind of arbiter of what "everyone" > thinks.|| > > Then prove me wrong. List the senior lawyers who are suing to have this > overturned on the basis of its unconstitutionality.
Fewer unconstitutional acts these days get resisted, much less fought in court, than used to be our tradition. People are now acclimated to the government doing outrageous things. The bailout & nationalization opposition is still forming along these grounds and will play out over the years, but the health care opposition is already well formed. In general, the seizure of the health care industry is much more blatant and menacing because of the federal mandate and the expansion of powers of the IRS to peek into private accounts. (I love how you freak out over warrantless wiretaps -- which by the way Obama just extended another year! -- but are mum about even more outrageous abuses of power currently being perpetrated by your hero): http://www.redstate.com/solidprinciples/2010/03/20/state-attorney-generals-will-sue-dc-over-obamacare/ http://article.wn.com/view/2010/03/18/Virginia_will_sue_feds_over_healthcare_takeover/ Plenty of links to constitutionality challenges being prepared if you want to google them yourself. I grow weary of proving the obvious to you time and again. - Publius > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Publius Maximus > Sent: Sunday, 21 March 2010 12:43 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Impeach the President > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:07 PM, geoff <[email protected]> wrote: >> || Find me the clause in the Constitution that gives the President or >> Congress these powers.|| >> >> Find me the ones where they are PROHIBITED. > > It's called the 10th Amendment. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constituti > on > >> See there is an entire supreme >> court and literally thousands of senior constitutional lawyers who I am >> guessing know more about it than you. And they don't think that. Thats > kinda >> a clue... > > I love how you think you're some kind of arbiter of what "everyone" thinks. > >> >> Time for you to come to Australia and experience the warmth and the > freedom >> and the.. employment. > > By the time Obama is done with this country, even Australia might look good. > > - Publius > >> > -- > > "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country, > under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object > of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to > subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign > powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of > them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be > avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose > situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful > and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59] > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
