geoff wrote: > Ive often heard amateur constitutional opinion and that is exactly what it > is - amateur. If the nations constitutional lawyers are not objecting and > the supreme court isn't then who are YOU are any of you to say you are right > and 100,000 trained professionals aren't? That just isn't credible.
Hi Geoff, Well, that is the standard argument for a lot of things in the US. To paraphrase the generic form "We are legal (or whatever) professionals, but you (everyone else) are just (laymen, amateurs). So you give us all of your money (always about money) and (someone) will dole out a living allowance to you for what (we decide) you 'actually' need". Makes sense to them, and to those who hate or envy us. Lawyers are poorly regarded in the US. >> || I love how you think you're some kind of arbiter of what "everyone" >> thinks.|| >> >> Then prove me wrong. List the senior lawyers who are suing to have this >> overturned on the basis of its unconstitutionality. > > > Hi Geoff, > > Actually, Bob is right, the 10th does prohibit what is going on - the > power to do health care - or anything not specified in the constitution > - is reserved to the states or the people. > > However, pigs will fly before any lawyer will care. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
