to reward failure will ensue that you receive more failure

On 3/20/2010 8:44 PM, geoff wrote:
> You just don't get it do you?? Ford had a third choice that the others
> didn't have - 'trading out of difficulties'. The other two were bankrupt and
> you CANT trade out of that. For starters, it is illegal.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Publius Maximus
> Sent: Sunday, 21 March 2010 9:46 AM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Impeach the President
>
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Virgil Bierschwale<[email protected]>
> wrote:
>    
>> Sorry, but I'm not seeing what you're seeing as their last quarterly
>> wasnt too bad
>>
>> http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:F&fstype=ii
>>
>> Their annual shows the first profit in a long time
>>
>> Not too shabby from where I'm sitting..
>>      
> Well, and the point was that the supposed choice between
> nationalization and bankruptcy is a false dichotomy. Ford is surviving
> without handing over control to the government.
>
> - Publius
>
>    
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.791 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2760 - Release Date: 03/20/10 
> 14:33:00
>
>    

-- 
Virgil Bierschwale
Vets Finding Vets <http://www.VetsFindingVets.org>
Keep America At Work <http://www.KeepAmericaAtWork.com>


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to