Stephen Russell wrote on 2010-04-15: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Alan Bourke <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:41 -0700, "Michael Madigan" >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> If Kaspersky made seat belts, they'd weight 300 pounds and strangle >>> you on impact. >> >> They'd make your car go 20% slower for no apparent reason also. > ---------------------------- > > Why do you feel that it is grabbing so much in resources? > > Do you have any tools that point to the product consuming either CPU > Cycles or memory? > > I had AVG and got rid of that about a year ago. Felt that Kaspersky > was leaner and much meaner with respect to web pages and inbound email. > > >
Stephen, It's been a full two years since Kaspersky was working in this office. The time to copy a file to/from the network without Kaspersky on the workstation vs. with was 3 and 4 times longer. It would take 2 minutes for a Vista UAC dialog to appear when attempting to run an installer from the network drive. Internet traffic here is slow because of where the office is located. Though a provider is currently running fiber through the complex, perhaps soon fast downloads won't be only at home. So, internet has always been slow, with or without any anti-virus. Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000201cadcc0$da70fd70$8f52f8...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
