I don't have the answer ergo why I ask the question. I would think that her failure to comply with the original ruling would automatically eliminate her from future consideration. She stayed, illegally, in this country and had every intention of continuing to do so until outed by the Times of the UK during the election run-up. You cannot convince me that the granting of her petition at this time had nothing to do with Obama, regardless of the propganda issued by the White House.
Are you attempting to compare the Shah to Obama? ::michael On 5/19/10, Stephen Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Michael Oke, II <[email protected]> wrote: >> So what was the basis of her claim in 2002, that was denied in 2004? >> Obama claims no knowledge of her at that point and time so it can hardly >> be the relationship that she had with him. or can it? >> >> Regardless, her request was denied, why did she not leave? > ---------------------- > > You seem to know the answers so please tell me. I have no idea. > > I remember fellow students whose family were tied to the Shah when he > was removed. They were real scared. > > > > > -- > Stephen Russell > > Sr. Production Systems Programmer > CIMSgts > > 901.246-0159 cell > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
