Michael Oke, II wrote: > Ricardo Aráoz wrote: >> Michael Oke, II wrote: >>> An attempt to one person's asylum request and violations with Germany in >>> 1933? Yes that about sums up the logic that you have demonstrated time >>> and time again on this list. In other words, very twisted. >> Maybe I'm not proficient in the English language? What does the phrase >> "An attempt to one person's asylum request and violations with Germany >> in 1933?" mean? What does an "attempt to one person's asylum request" >> mean? What does "violations with Germany in 1933" mean? Is it that >> someone not mentioned with the complicity of someone named "Germany" >> raped people in 1933? >> Honestly, I can not communicate with you if you keep using this language >> that looks like English but is not. Can we please go back to English? >> > You aren't very proficient in English, that much is fairly obvious.
Sorry, are you proficient in Spanish, Portuguese, or French? So that we may keep communicating in a proper manner. > I > have been using English and will continue to do so. If you can't keep > up, that is your problem and not mine. > > That said, I did drop one word, compare. An attempt to compare one > person's ... So bottom line is you were *not* communicating properly, and my inadequate understanding of the English language gets blamed? > > See if you can figure out what was being said from there. > > > Hmmm, by my upbringing, it is always wrong to defy a legal order. That > doesn't mean that you cannot protest same but that is a different issue. So in Nazi Germany, were you a German, you would have protested the laws that sent Jews to concentration camps but you would have obeyed the law and do what you must as a law abiding citizen to comply with it.(so my "attempt to compare" was not much off the target) > >> Maybe because I'm commenting on the consistency of your comments and not >> on the actual link? > You are the one that said that you didn't follow the link, indicating, > as always, that you were commenting on it Lets try a bit louder "I WAS COMMENTING ON THE CONSISTENCY OF YOUR COMMMENTS AND NOT ON THE ACTUAL LINK", so obviously I was not "commenting on it". You might try and raise the volume of your hearing aid if that's the problem, I cannot shout all day. (if that's not the problem then there's an inherent difficulty with your reading skills and nothing can be done about it) _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
