An attempt to one person's asylum request and violations with Germany in 1933? Yes that about sums up the logic that you have demonstrated time and time again on this list. In other words, very twisted.
Nobody is saying that I should be consulted about which laws should and should not be followed but another twisted example from you. And of course you didn't follow the link. Why bother reading before commenting, that just allows common sense to invade and you aren't about to let that happen. ::michael Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > Michael Oke, II wrote: >> And you are surprised by this? Defiance of a legal order gets you >> permission to stay, nice precedence to set. > > You mean legal as in 1933 Germany when the law said Jews where to be > rounded up? Because it was a legal order, sanctioned according to the > laws of the land. > Or maybe we should always check with you as to which legal orders are to > be disobeyed and which are not? > (BTW, didn't bother to follow the link, I never follow these fools links). > >> ::michael >> >> Pete Theisen wrote: >>> Hi Everybody, >>> >>> http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20100518/ARTICLE/5181045/-1/todayspaper?Title=President-s-aunt-wins-asylum-in-U-S- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
