On 6/16/10 8:57 PM, Rick Schummer wrote: > Hi Paul, > >>> If it has to be .NET, I'd go for IronPython.<< > > Is this based on your experience with Python or direct experience with > IronPython? I am curious about this because most of us agree that Microsoft > normally gets things closer to right after three versions and IronPython is > really a v1.0 release now.
I have no experience with IronPython or .NET. But I love Python, and saw some presentations from the IronPython group at PyCon a few months back. Actually, they crashed and burned now that I think about it... > I think it is cool that Microsoft has IronPython and IronRuby and have > returned to the concept of dynamic runtimes, but I am at the same time > cautious considering they are the least mature of the languages in .NET. I wouldn't really do anything for the web with Microsoft technologies. Why bother? Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
