Jack & Vincent - I really appreciate that suggestion. It sounds like a great option - which also sounds nice & stable. The problem I have - is that they are NOT going to layout any money for something like this. They would rather stumble along with misspellings - and have the person who enters these tasks (from the slipsheets that my app prints out - and gets entered into another system - a kludgy old DOS based FP system - which, eventually - down the road - I will be updating my App to Directly push the data into this other DOS type app) do the spelling corrections. So - although FoxSpell sounds great - its not an option for me.
Thanks, -K- -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vincent Teachout Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 10:21 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: A Spell Checker for a VFP EditBox? Jack Skelley wrote: > Good Morning Kurt: > In my apps I use Foxspell. It works super in VFP 6,8, and 9. > See http://www.hallogram.com/foxspell/ I think it is $250. > I have used it for 11 years. It is written in 100% Foxpro code. You get the source code. I have modified it for the look and feel of my apps. > It has never crashed or given me any grief! I second FoxSpell. It's practically plug and play. I've used it for 10 years now, and never had a bit of trouble with it. [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a14071a1...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
