Kurt Wendt wrote: > Michael & Pete - I guess you are right - looking at it that way - it is > a Technology issue... > > ...my apologies Pete!
Hi Kurt, Ah, not to worry. Not as though you were the usual thought police, LOL. > I'd have to call spam and discussions thereof tech-related. > > ::michael > > On Aug 25, 2010 4:36 PM, "Pete Theisen" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Kurt Wendt wrote: >>> Pete, >>> >>> First of all - a lot (really, like Shitloads) of people use Facebook > and like it - so it can't be ALL that Bad (as I have an account on there > - >>> but, I'm not very active). >>> >>> Secondly - this is just yet ANOTHER Type of Spam - and you can't > totally blame FaceBook about it. There's almost always been SPAMmers out > there - >>> and they keep changing their game - so I see no point in getting > angry about it! >>> >>> Thirdly - you posted to [NF] - and, I hate to say it - but, this > really should have been an [OT] type post. Or, maybe it's just me... >>> >>> :-( >>> -K- >> Hmm, isn't spam tech? I agree if I were to be posting about snail-mail >> chain letters and junk mail that *that* would be [OT] but somehow . . > . >>> I just got some spam from someone I have never heard of to visit > their >>> facebook store, if that's what you call it, and buy "Knight Polo". > Thus:... -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
