On 9/22/2010 3:43 AM, Ricardo Araoz wrote: > On 21/09/10 22:37, Michael Oke, II wrote: >> Would it be? Or would it be about what she was "convicted" of? >> > > So to you it is a legislative matter. It is not that stoning a woman is > barbaric, what you object is that the cause, according to *your* > cultural background, is not proper. > No, I asked you a question, one that you seem too dense to understand. Was the worldwide outcry about the method of punishment or the crime for which she was being punished for or, perhaps, both? I took no part in any protests related to this matter so I'm not sure.
>> You are right, the murdering of one's citizenry is barbaric. Fortunately, >> that isn't why is happening in the US. But you can feel free to proclaim >> that it is. Please elaborate on what this woman was accused/"convicted" >> of. Hardly will compared with someone that raped and murdered a child, will >> it? >> > > Will it? To them this woman's crime is against the Quran, and that is > far worse than against humanity for them. All you are saying is that > they are barbaric because their notion of how wrong is something is > different than yours. To me you are both the same, people who will > murder to enforce their will. > I never said that they were barbaric for punishing their citizenry. Enforcing their will or their laws? Or, to you, is there no difference? I did say that I find stoning to be a barbaric method of punishment but, if under their laws, it is permissible then they have every right to utilize it. >> I couldn't begin to tell you the numbers on the US death roll as, frankly, >> that number is of no concern to me. > > Their numbers of stoned women or hand cutted is of no concern to them, > frankly. So what's the big difference between you and them? > Is it of no concern to them? Perhaps it is not, on this I have no information either way. >> You could surely do a little research >> and learn what it is though as the US would make such data available unlike, >> say Iran. >> > > Sure, because they kept the stoning a state secret. LOL > (BTW the US keeps it's political assassinations as secret as they can, > so what's the difference again?) > Wow, talk about jumping off the track. The government announced what was happening or it was leaked from some other source? Political assassination by the US, or any other government, is hardly relevant to this discussion. Suffice it to say that the US is hardly alone in the use of such actions. ::michael _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
