On 9/22/2010 10:39 AM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > On 22/09/2010 02:28 p.m., Michael Oke, II wrote: >> >>> So, in this issue, you were for the Imans and Ahmadinejad. Good. >>> >> I would hardly categorize it as "for" them but yes, it would seem to be >> within their laws and at their discretion. >> > > Why am I not surprised? > Probably because you are unable to understand the distinction.
>> >>>> Wow, talk about jumping off the track. The government announced what >>>> was happening or it was leaked from some other source? >>> It was announced as any other of the court's judgments are announced. >>> Hardly a secret. >>> >> Was it? Where? Can you provide any link stating that this was >> announced as a matter of course in their country or is that not possible? > > Did I give you the impression I was willing to be your errand boy? hahaha > Hardly would make you my errand boy but a wholly expected attitude. > >>>> Political assassination by the US, or any other government, is hardly >>>> relevant to this discussion. Suffice it to say that the US is hardly >>>> alone in the use of such actions. >>> Yeah. The guy who murdered "your Sil" said something similar. He said he >>> was hardly alone in the use of such actions. >>> Do you feel any better about it? >>> >> Hardly see the comparison between the murder of a 14 year old girl and >> political assassination but feel free to continue to draw lines in the >> sand. Might be all the entertainment you have. > > Well you see, it's so easy to dismiss people you don't know or > understand as "collateral damage". It's a bit different when you have > the blood and guts of a relative all over you. > So yes, the people your country assassinate may be as lovely as your > Sil, and have the same right to live as she did, and have relatives who > weep for them as much as you do. But it's easier to dismiss them offhand > when it's not your own blood there. Isn't it? > Now, as long as you justify US assassinations I think I'll choose to > justify Sil's killer and hope he's alive and happy. You see, an eye for > an eye is sometimes a tough deal. Isn't it? > Ah but I am not dismissing anyone. Those people that you claim to have been the target of political assassination may very well have been perfectly nice people or they might have been removed for real reasons. On this I have no personal knowledge but if you do, please feel free to share. And, regardless, I'm sure that their relatives did grieve for them, that or they were glad that they had been removed from this earth, no matter who was responsible for that departure. You are free to wish her killer whatever you choose to. I'd caution you not to do so to my face tho, and that is all that I'll say on that. ::michael > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
