On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Ed Leafe <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 21, 2010, at 10:43 PM, Michael Oke, II wrote: > >> I wanted to see if he would admit that he was attempting to compare >> the punishments for adultery with a capital offense. It's way to do when >> you try to make the offenses appear to be the same, or least remotely >> relateable. > > > "A marriage shall be considered valid only if the wife is a virgin. If > the wife is not a virgin, she shall be executed." (Deut 22:13-21) > > Hmmm... sure sounds like a capital offense to me. But what kind of > sick freak would follow a book that called for such actions? ---------------------
I thought that the punishment was about telling a lie. You kind of scissored the passage. You have to like the footnote for it. 3 [15] The evidence of her virginity: the bridal garment or sheet stained with a little blood from the first nuptial relations. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer CIMSgts 901.246-0159 cell _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
