I believe that there are a number of protests, both local and worldwide, whenever an execution date approaches in the US but why let fact stand in the way of a fairy tale.
Why is okay to stone the woman but not the man involved in this? After all, it takes both. ::michael On 9/21/2010 3:31 PM, Ricardo Araoz wrote: > He says the whole world complained when they were going to stone a > woman, but nobody complains when USA will electrocute (or gas, or > whatever) another one. He's absolutely right. > And if the world eventually protests, and USA pays no mind, then > Ahmadinejad will have been more civilized than the USA. > > Besides which.... why this sexism. This chauvinism. Why is it worse for > a country to murder a woman than to murder a man? > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
