Whoops, when my $8.00 spell checker offered words, I was sure I clicked on criticize, but I must have missed; because, my post has criticism. LOL
I should have said criticized instead of criticism. Regards, LelandJ On 10/29/2010 04:36 PM, Leland Jackson wrote: > On 10/29/2010 03:34 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: >> Stephen Russell wrote: >>> <http://chicagoist.com/2010/10/29/friday_afternoon_diversion_97.php> >>> >> Hi Stephen, >> >> No, my automatics are both 9mm. Some of the other gun guys on the list >> have .45s, maybe Leland. > I have a Beretta 90-TWO and Beretta PX4, both chambered in 9mm. I also > brought my wife a 9mm PX4, about six months ago, after she nagged for a > couple of years. > > The 9mm ball ammo, (eg full metal jacket in 115gr), is a NATO standard > round that has been criticism by many currently in the military, and > many ex-military types, as not heavy duty enough, and perhaps that is > true. However, the ammo available to civvies, like you and I, in 9mm > are much more lethal and hard hitting than the NATO standard 9mm, so I'm > satisfied its a good defensive round for anyone not bound to the NATO > standard. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
