It's operator error. --- On Fri, 10/29/10, Pete Theisen <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Pete Theisen <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OT] Is this you Pete? > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, October 29, 2010, 11:55 PM > Leland Jackson wrote: > > Whoops, when my $8.00 spell checker > offered words, I was sure I > > clicked on criticize, but I must have missed; because, > my post has > > criticism. LOL > > Hi Leland, > > Try upgrading to the $8.50 version. > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://pete-theisen.com/ > http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
