On 07/11/10 12:44, John Weller wrote: > Hi Leland, > > I think you misunderstood my reply (or I didn't make it clear enough <g>). > Mike suggested that using fibre optic was slowing transmission down based on > your original comment - he (and you) are of course quite correct, the > velocity of propagation in a fibre optic is less than in copper. My point > was that whilst velocity of propagation is lower the possible data > transmission rate in baud is higher through fibre optic than copper as there > will be much less degradation at high frequencies. There is also virtually > no RF interference on fibre optic unlike copper. >
LOL Right John. They should be reeeally worried. After all there will be a *significant* difference in transmission speed in 1000 feet between .6 and .9 of c ;c) _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
