This guy can't be married, can he? --- On Thu, 11/11/10, Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Nicholas Geti <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OT] Serious legal challenges to Health Bill > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, November 11, 2010, 5:47 PM > The crocodile wind takes my breathe > away. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "geoff" <[email protected]> > To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 5:14 PM > Subject: RE: [OT] Serious legal challenges to Health Bill > > > > The question is breathtaking in the way it indicates > complete disregard > > for > > others. > > I expect little more from madagain > > > > Geoff Flight > > General Manager > > > > Sustainable Resources Industry Training Pty Ltd > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf > > Of Pete Theisen > > Sent: Friday, 12 November 2010 8:29 AM > > To: ProFox Email List > > Subject: Re: [OT] Serious legal challenges to Health > Bill > > > > Michael Madigan wrote: > >> Why do people have kids if they can't afford > them? > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > The poor value children and family - and they believe > in the idea of > > immortal souls. They are already starving so one more > starving person is > > actually no change to them. They just throw another > handful of beans and > > another handful of rice into the pot, with some more > water. They already > > have the clothes that the older one grew out of. > > > > Relief benefits are per person, not per couple. So > another child will > > increase the benefit. If it did not, the poor will > still have more > > children, it never occurs to them not to. "Birth > Control" is a middle > > and upper class habit. > > > >>>> They can pay Social Security without > getting free > >>> health care. > > > >>> True, but more will survive to adulthood if > they get health > >>> care. They > >>> certainly won't be able to get it unless it is > free - they > >>> are paid next > >>> to nothing. > >>> > >>>>>> And why should a family have a > litter of kids > >>> with > >>>>> free health care? > >>>>> Because they are Catholic? Never mind > that YOUR > >>> Social > >>>>> Security is based > >>>>> on the taxes levied on the next > generation's > >>> productivity. > >>>>> Don't say you > >>>>> won't need Social Security. Become > disabled in a > >>> down > >>>>> market and you > >>>>> WILL need Social Security. > >>>>> > >>>>>>> Yeah. Even the Bible has > nothing to > >>>>>>> say about health care being a > basic > >>>>>>> right. Actually it doesn't say > anything > >>> about > >>>>> wealth being > >>>>>>> a basic right > >>>>>>> either. It just says the > wealthy should > >>> help the > >>>>> poor; not > >>>>>>> to bring them up > >>> -- > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Pete > >>> http://pete-theisen.com/ > >>> http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ > >>> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
