Ed would be right, if it weren't for the lack of a little clause known as sever-ability, something that the "geniuses" that passed this "bill" failed to include. Maybe if they had ready it first?
::michael On 12/13/2010 2:07 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Dec 13, 2010, at 5:00 PM, geoff wrote: > >> It is amazing watching your Americans rant on about your healthcare system. > > > It is more amazing to watch people who are so full of hatred that they > misinterpret a local ruling about a single part of a wide-ranging bill as a > universal rejection. The same provision has received favorable rulings in the > other two court challenges to it so far, so what's different about this > ruling: > > http://gawker.com/5713041/judge-who-ruled-health-care-reform-unconstitutional-owns-piece-of-gop-consulting-firm > > ( -or- http://j.mp/hsnXaB ) > > "Henry E. Hudson, the federal judge in Virginia who just ruled health > care reform unconstitutional, owns between $15,000 and $50,000 in a GOP > political consulting firm that worked againsthealth care reform. You don't > say!" > > This isn't a legal ruling; it's a political ruling. > > > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
