On 12/13/2010 03:40 PM, Michael Madigan wrote: > WTF does stemmantics mean?
se·man·tics (s-mntks) /n./ /(used with a sing. or pl. verb)/ *1. * /Linguistics/ The study or science of meaning in language. *2. * /Linguistics/ The study of relationships between signs and symbols and what they represent. Also called /semasiology/. *3. * The meaning or the interpretation of a word, sentence, or other language form: We're basically agreed; let's not quibble over semantics. Regards, LelandJ > --- On Mon, 12/13/10, Leland Jackson<[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Leland Jackson<[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OT] Federal Judge finds Obamacare UNCONSTITUTIONAL! >> To: "ProFox Email List"<[email protected]> >> Date: Monday, December 13, 2010, 3:48 PM >> On 12/13/2010 02:19 PM, Michael Oke, >> II wrote: >>> Leland, >>> You do realize that you are assuming that the bill >> that Obama rammed >>> through regardless of what the majority of Americans >> wanted, is >>> universal health care. >> This isn't about stemmatics. What passed, whatever >> you want to call it, >> sure beat what we had, at lease for almost all American, >> but probably >> not for the Health Insurance Companies, and Health Care >> Industries >> including Doctors, Hospitals, Pharmaceutical Companies, >> medical >> equipment manufacturers, and all the others that were >> ripping off the >> system for every last nickle they could get their hand on. >> >> >>> It isn't and never was but you are >> probably not >>> capable of understanding that. >> Oh, I understand ok. LOL >> >>> Perhaps if a president, any president >>> not just this one, could actually craft a bill that >> provided for >>> universal health care, Americans might actually be for >> that. >> >> Well, at least we now have a start, thanks to the >> Democrats. I'm sure >> Universal Health Care will evolve over time to address >> problems, but >> Just because this legislation wasn't predominately written >> by >> Republicans doesn't make it bad. >> >> Regards, >> >> LelandJ >> >>> ::michael >>> >>> On 12/13/2010 11:18 AM, Leland Jackson wrote: >>>> If Universal Health Care is unconstitutional, then >> so is Social Security >>>> and Medicare. I'm anxious for the Supreme >> Court to hear this case; >>>> because, I'm sure they will not rule against fair >> congressional legislation. >>>> After all you have strongly supported the idea >> that it is congress that >>>> makes laws, not activist judges ruling from the >> bench. LOL >>>> #--------------------------- >>>> Excerpt: >>>> >>>> Opponents, including Cuccinelli, have argued the >> feds are stepping on >>>> the Constitution's handling of interstate commerce >> by enforcing a >>>> mandate. Specifically, shouldn't a person be free >> to make his or her own >>>> decision about insurance coverage? >>>> >>>> The feds have maintained that's a false choice >> because everyone, at some >>>> point, becomes a consumer of health care services. >> Indeed, the feds have >>>> argued, deciding not to buy insurance coverage has >> a profound economic >>>> effect that crosses state lines. So, either way, >> you're already part of >>>> interstate commerce when it comes to health, and >> that means the >>>> government has the authority to regulate your >> behavior. >>>> http://healthreform.kff.org/video-explainers/individual-requirement.aspx >>>> >>>> http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2010/12/13/132025701/virginia-judge-rules-against-coverage-mandate-in-health-overhaul >>>> >>>> #--------------------------- >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> LelandJ >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/13/2010 12:45 PM, Michael Madigan wrote: >>>>> Bye Bye Barry! >>>>> >>>>> http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/12/13/breaking-virginia-judge-rules-parts-of-health-care-reform-unconstitutional/ >>>>> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
