On 12/13/2010 04:00 PM, Leland Jackson wrote: > On 12/13/2010 03:54 PM, Michael Madigan wrote: >> I know what SEMANTICS is, I wanted to know what STEMMANTICS was. >> > STEMMANTICS was a mistake I accidentially clicked from a suggested list > of words presented to replace an incorrect spelling I made of the word > semantics. > > > Regards, > > LelandJ
Ok, I see what you mean. Stemmantics isn't a word, so its "semantics" incorrectly typed or spelled. I may not have run my 8$ spell checker before hitting send on the offending post. Regards, LelandJ >> --- On Mon, 12/13/10, Leland Jackson<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> From: Leland Jackson<[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [OT] Federal Judge finds Obamacare UNCONSTITUTIONAL! >>> To: "ProFox Email List"<[email protected]> >>> Date: Monday, December 13, 2010, 4:51 PM >>> On 12/13/2010 03:40 PM, Michael >>> Madigan wrote: >>>> WTF does stemmantics mean? >>> se·man·tics (s-mntks) >>> /n./ /(used with a sing. or pl. verb)/ >>> *1. * /Linguistics/ The study or science of meaning in >>> language. >>> *2. * /Linguistics/ The study of relationships between >>> signs and symbols >>> and what they represent. Also called /semasiology/. >>> *3. * The meaning or the interpretation of a word, >>> sentence, or other >>> language form: We're basically agreed; let's not quibble >>> over semantics. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> LelandJ >>> >>> >>> >>>> --- On Mon, 12/13/10, Leland Jackson<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> From: Leland Jackson<[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: Re: [OT] Federal Judge finds Obamacare >>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL! >>>>> To: "ProFox Email List"<[email protected]> >>>>> Date: Monday, December 13, 2010, 3:48 PM >>>>> On 12/13/2010 02:19 PM, Michael Oke, >>>>> II wrote: >>>>>> Leland, >>>>>> You do realize that you are assuming that the >>> bill >>>>> that Obama rammed >>>>>> through regardless of what the majority of >>> Americans >>>>> wanted, is >>>>>> universal health care. >>>>> This isn't about stemmatics. What passed, >>> whatever >>>>> you want to call it, >>>>> sure beat what we had, at lease for almost all >>> American, >>>>> but probably >>>>> not for the Health Insurance Companies, and Health >>> Care >>>>> Industries >>>>> including Doctors, Hospitals, Pharmaceutical >>> Companies, >>>>> medical >>>>> equipment manufacturers, and all the others that >>> were >>>>> ripping off the >>>>> system for every last nickle they could get their >>> hand on. >>>>>> It isn't and never was but >>> you are >>>>> probably not >>>>>> capable of understanding that. >>>>> Oh, I understand ok. LOL >>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps if a president, >>> any president >>>>>> not just this one, could actually craft a bill >>> that >>>>> provided for >>>>>> universal health care, Americans might >>> actually be for >>>>> that. >>>>> >>>>> Well, at least we now have a start, thanks to the >>>>> Democrats. I'm sure >>>>> Universal Health Care will evolve over time to >>> address >>>>> problems, but >>>>> Just because this legislation wasn't predominately >>> written >>>>> by >>>>> Republicans doesn't make it bad. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> LelandJ >>>>> >>>>>> ::michael >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/13/2010 11:18 AM, Leland Jackson wrote: >>>>>>> If Universal Health Care is >>> unconstitutional, then >>>>> so is Social Security >>>>>>> and Medicare. I'm anxious for the >>> Supreme >>>>> Court to hear this case; >>>>>>> because, I'm sure they will not rule >>> against fair >>>>> congressional legislation. >>>>>>> After all you have strongly supported the >>> idea >>>>> that it is congress that >>>>>>> makes laws, not activist judges ruling >>> from the >>>>> bench. LOL >>>>>>> #--------------------------- >>>>>>> Excerpt: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Opponents, including Cuccinelli, have >>> argued the >>>>> feds are stepping on >>>>>>> the Constitution's handling of interstate >>> commerce >>>>> by enforcing a >>>>>>> mandate. Specifically, shouldn't a person >>> be free >>>>> to make his or her own >>>>>>> decision about insurance coverage? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The feds have maintained that's a false >>> choice >>>>> because everyone, at some >>>>>>> point, becomes a consumer of health care >>> services. >>>>> Indeed, the feds have >>>>>>> argued, deciding not to buy insurance >>> coverage has >>>>> a profound economic >>>>>>> effect that crosses state lines. So, >>> either way, >>>>> you're already part of >>>>>>> interstate commerce when it comes to >>> health, and >>>>> that means the >>>>>>> government has the authority to regulate >>> your >>>>> behavior. >>>>>>> http://healthreform.kff.org/video-explainers/individual-requirement.aspx >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2010/12/13/132025701/virginia-judge-rules-against-coverage-mandate-in-health-overhaul >>>>>>> >>>>>>> #--------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LelandJ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12/13/2010 12:45 PM, Michael Madigan >>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Bye Bye Barry! >>>>>>>> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
