I have no intention of trying to change anyone's mind on this topic, but I do have some experience in this area related to FoxPro. I hired a top nuclear physicist to work for me writing FoxPro reports. He just happened to live in my neighborhood and came to our user group. He was not doing anything because all of our plants were on hold. He worked for me for about a year and then they called on him to start up a plant. He wrote all of the inspection software for the plants in FoxPro. Every nut, bolt, washer, scaffolding and everything in the plant was on an inspection schedule which he managed with a FoxPro program. We are hearing very little about how these things work and what the differences are between the new reactors and the old ones. As with anything, I research topics I am interested in and form my own opinions.
Jeff --------------- Jeff Johnson [email protected] (623) 582-0323 www.san-dc.com On 03/28/2011 06:00 PM, Paul McNett wrote: > On 3/28/11 3:41 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: >> There was a great deal of love talk about radioactive power generators >> over the past years. >> >> Where do you stand now? Still want one for your power? >> >> Personally I have been against them for over 32 years now. > I've been against nuclear for my entire life, but the Japan incident has > forced me to > think again. I'm pretty impressed with how little radioactivity has entered > the > environment given the age of the reactors and the magnitude of the > quake/tsunami. > > All in all, I'm still against, because I don't think we have a good answer on > where > to hold and how to transport the spent fuel rods. > > Paul > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
