On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:51 -0300, "Ricardo Aráoz" <[email protected]> wrote: > O > Then there is the problem of when things don't work as expected. Then > you have a Chernobyl.
Chernobyl was a bad reactor design, poorly maintained in a crumbling regime. > Of course this won't happen every year, but just > once every century is too much. Is it, statistically? If a Chernobyl happened once a century it would still cost far fewer lives than mining and coal/gas exploration, or probably even people erecting wind turbines at sea. Nothing is without risk. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
