On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Malcolm Greene <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm considering Hg (Mercurial) and Git. I'm leaning towards Git because > the github.com service appears to provide a well thought out, reasonably > priced, hosted solution.
There's a bit of community preference depending on your languages, (Rubyists like git, Pythonistas prefer Mercurial), but it's not a 100% either-or situation. > Would love to hear from any of you that have used Hg and switched to Git > or vice versa. I'm using git currently, because that's what the preference on a previous gig was, and the fingers are grooved into the commands. The easy stuff is easy: git status ... tells you what you've messed with git add <filename> <filename> <filename> lets you add new files or old files with changes git commit -m "This is my check in message" commits your changes to your local repo git push <options> ... pushes your changes to a remote repo you've defined. -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
