Adam Buckland wrote:
> 1. Who says he offered to surrender?
> 2. Who says they weren't trying to capture him alive?

Hi Adam,

The articles I read said he was shooting back "offering resistance" and 
he or one of the others was using a woman as a human shield.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/inside-operation-brought-osama-bin-laden/story?id=13506413

"U.S. officials said that Bin Laden himself fired his weapon during the 
fight, and that he was asked to surrender but did not. He was shot in 
the head and then shot again to make sure he was dead."

> I'm sure however there was a kill order from Obama. If the UK had intel 
> pointing to where he was the SAS would have done exactly the same thing for 
> 7/7. However all things considered... it's better that he's dead as alive 
> it'd of been a total distraction organising a trial, where jurisdiction would 
> be, appeals etc...
> 
> Dead and buried at sea, no grave, no place for tributes, no place to worship 
> a "fallen martyr"....
> 
> The only people without the high ground here are Al Quaeda and Pakistani 
> Intelligence who it is feared knew where he was all along...
> 
> I spend about 1/3rd of my working time in Muslim Countries and am in one 
> today (albeit one that is secular - Turkey) and the talk in the market this 
> morning was good, glad he's gone... no one was sticking up for him.....
> 
> I'll see what they are saying later in the week when I get to Malaysia...
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to