You can use github from the browser. https://github.com/blog/1204-notifications-stars says that if (you have a github account and you) watch a repository you get notification of updates.
https://github.com/settings/notifications lets you configure this (and choose whether your notifications are emailed to you -- I think they are emailed by default though). I hope this helps, -- Raul On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Wim de Lange <wimdela...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Michael > > (your name sounds Dutch to me) > > One of the differences between Android 2.x and 4.x. I moved from 2 to 4 > myself somewhere in the past on the same phone and still I have trouble > locating some functions. > > I use the latest version 1.0.5. Is there a way to receive notifications on > update? I've looked around on GitHub, but could not find anything other > then installing a GitHub client on my Windows PC? > > Groetjes, > Wim > > > 2012/9/14 Michael Dykman <mdyk...@gmail.com> > >> Sorry gentlemen, >> >> The instructions I gave for enabling the keyboard were oriented to the >> 2.x android device I own. I explicitly targetted a low-numbered >> version of android to guarantee the widest distribution. >> >> Very glad you found it. Are you using the latest: 1.0.5 as available >> on github? ( >> https://github.com/mdykman/jconsole_for_android/blob/master/dist/j-console-1.0.5.apk?raw=true >> ). >> With that version, we get get slightly more sane keyboard. >> >> - michael >> >> >> >> 1. The %. implementation does not take different paths that are >> dependent >> >> on the values in a non-singular matrix. (Part of what makes it >> >> algorithmically interesting :-). Therefore the time required should be >> the >> >> same for different random matrices. Of course, unless you have ripped >> out >> >> most of the stuff from your machine, that time would be impacted by >> e-mail >> >> arriving, your moving the mouse, the browser doing whatever, your >> >> anti-virus acting paranoid, whatever, whatever, ... >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Joey K Tuttle <j...@qued.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > I agree with your point, but the "benchmark" has always included >> >> > generating the matrix and that is typically a very small part of the >> time >> >> > and should be relatively stable (although I suppose inverting the same >> >> > "random" matrix over and over would remove some variation). Your >> >> suggestion >> >> > of using a left argument for 6!:2 is the best way to reduce (or at >> lease >> >> > smooth out) variability. >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> >> >> >> -- >> - michael dykman >> - mdyk...@gmail.com >> >> May the Source be with you. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
