Hi Michael Thanks for the answer. I was going for the updates, not the download, that was already on the system. But I like to get the updates and the info on them. I did not install the client, but I registered as a follower, so I should receive an message when a new version is available, if I understood well.
Nice to hear that you have Dutch roots. Hoorn is not really close to where I live, although for Canadians I think it is just around the corner. It is 77km away or 191km depending on which of the four Hoorn's that is. :-) Time to spend some time with J. After developing several applications on APL during the 80's it is nice to have a language available again on multiple platforms that is so much alike APL. Groetjes, Wim 2012/9/17 Michael Dykman <mdyk...@gmail.com> > Hi Wim, > > You could go the route of installing a git client, but should not need to. > > Assuming you have your Android settings set to allow non-market > applications, you can install the latest package by hitting the 'raw' > url directly as listed below directly from your android. Failing > that, hitting it with a browser should result in a download which you > may manually copy to your device. > > > https://github.com/mdykman/jconsole_for_android/blob/master/dist/j-console-1.0.5.apk?raw=true > > Yes, the name is Dutch; My father comes from Hoorn. I however was > raised in Canada and never learned a word of it I'm afraid. > > - michael > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > You can use github from the browser. > > > > https://github.com/blog/1204-notifications-stars says that if (you > > have a github account and you) watch a repository you get notification > > of updates. > > > > https://github.com/settings/notifications lets you configure this (and > > choose whether your notifications are emailed to you -- I think they > > are emailed by default though). > > > > I hope this helps, > > > > -- > > Raul > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Wim de Lange <wimdela...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Michael > >> > >> (your name sounds Dutch to me) > >> > >> One of the differences between Android 2.x and 4.x. I moved from 2 to 4 > >> myself somewhere in the past on the same phone and still I have trouble > >> locating some functions. > >> > >> I use the latest version 1.0.5. Is there a way to receive > notifications on > >> update? I've looked around on GitHub, but could not find anything other > >> then installing a GitHub client on my Windows PC? > >> > >> Groetjes, > >> Wim > >> > >> > >> 2012/9/14 Michael Dykman <mdyk...@gmail.com> > >> > >>> Sorry gentlemen, > >>> > >>> The instructions I gave for enabling the keyboard were oriented to the > >>> 2.x android device I own. I explicitly targetted a low-numbered > >>> version of android to guarantee the widest distribution. > >>> > >>> Very glad you found it. Are you using the latest: 1.0.5 as available > >>> on github? ( > >>> > https://github.com/mdykman/jconsole_for_android/blob/master/dist/j-console-1.0.5.apk?raw=true > >>> ). > >>> With that version, we get get slightly more sane keyboard. > >>> > >>> - michael > >>> > >>> > >>> >> 1. The %. implementation does not take different paths that are > >>> dependent > >>> >> on the values in a non-singular matrix. (Part of what makes it > >>> >> algorithmically interesting :-). Therefore the time required > should be > >>> the > >>> >> same for different random matrices. Of course, unless you have > ripped > >>> out > >>> >> most of the stuff from your machine, that time would be impacted by > >>> e-mail > >>> >> arriving, your moving the mouse, the browser doing whatever, your > >>> >> anti-virus acting paranoid, whatever, whatever, ... > >>> >> > >>> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Joey K Tuttle <j...@qued.com> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> > I agree with your point, but the "benchmark" has always included > >>> >> > generating the matrix and that is typically a very small part of > the > >>> time > >>> >> > and should be relatively stable (although I suppose inverting the > same > >>> >> > "random" matrix over and over would remove some variation). Your > >>> >> suggestion > >>> >> > of using a left argument for 6!:2 is the best way to reduce (or at > >>> lease > >>> >> > smooth out) variability. > >>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> - michael dykman > >>> - mdyk...@gmail.com > >>> > >>> May the Source be with you. > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >>> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > -- > - michael dykman > - mdyk...@gmail.com > > May the Source be with you. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
