Thanks for that.
Once I've got this lot well under my belt, I *will* be generalizing to 3-D,
of course.
I think a Conway's Life-3D, or 3-d tic-tac-toe will be good examples for J.
Of course, by the time we get to 3-D tic-tac-toe on a torus, then cheap
tricks like "padding" to read will have to be discarded, and something more
serious adopted. (I mean, you're not going to pad a 3-d cube with 6 copies
of itself, are you? LOL)
I'll leave this for a lazy day....
I haven't looked at your option that separates data from structure (saving
that) I hope it may provide some hints. ;)
On 16 November 2012 15:49, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Alex Giannakopoulos <
> aeg...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> > Nice "torus-pad" ([:|:{:,]{.)^:2
>
> Or, more generally:
>
> (0 |:{:,],{.)^:(#@$)
>
> Also, here's a general "fill pad":
>
> ((_1 ["0 $) |. ({.~ 2 +$))
>
> That said: generality can be good for insight, and in utility
> contexts, but can also sometimes be bad in application contexts.
>
> FYI,
>
> --
> Raul
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
